Lone accountant takes on
IRS and wins
By
CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER, AP Business Writer,
August 24, 2008
It took
seven years, but Charles Ulrich did something many people dream about, but
few succeed at: He beat the IRS in a tax dispute.
Not only
that, but tax experts say potentially millions of other taxpayers could
benefit from his victory.
The
accountant from Baxter, Minn., challenged the method the IRS has used for
more than 20 years to tax shares and cash distributed by mutual life
insurance firms to their policyholders when they reorganize as public
companies.
A
federal court recently agreed with his interpretation.
"There's
a tremendous amount of money at stake," said Robert Willens, a New York
City-based tax analyst at Robert Willens LLC. "Tens of thousands of people
could be in line for a refund."
Don
Alexander, an IRS commissioner in the 1970s and now a tax attorney in
Washington, said while it's not unusual for individuals to take on the
agency, "most of them lose."
Alexander called it "quite a significant case."
The
dispute arose when more than 30 mutual life insurance companies became
publicly traded corporations in the late 1990s and earlier this decade, in a
process known as "demutualization."
Mutual
companies are owned by their policyholders, so the companies provided stock
and cash to compensate them for the loss of their ownership interests when
they went public.
All
told, roughly 30 million policyholders received distributions, Ulrich
estimates. MetLife Inc. provided over $7 billion of stock to about 11
million policyholders when it went public in 2000, while Prudential
distributed $12.5 billion in stock to another 11 million.
The IRS
held that the recipients hadn't paid anything for the shares and owed taxes
on the full amount when the shares were sold. Cash distributions also were
fully taxable, the IRS said.
That
didn't sound right to Ulrich, 72, an accountant for 49 years. He began
researching the issue in 2001, when he received shares from two companies,
Prudential and Indianapolis Life.
Ulrich
concluded that policyholders had paid for their ownership rights through
their premiums so the distributions should have been tax-free.
That
could make a significant difference in what a taxpayer owes. If a company
distributed shares worth $30 and a recipient subsequently sold them at $32,
under the IRS' view they would pay taxes on all $32. Under Ulrich's
interpretation, they would owe taxes only on the $2 per share gain.
In 2003,
Ulrich publicized his views by contacting tax and insurance experts and
setting up a Web site.
"Largely
I was regarded as a lunatic," he said, who "would never prevail against the
IRS."
Still,
some people who'd paid taxes contacted Ulrich and asked him to file refund
requests, which he did, for a fee. Some of those refunds were granted, he
said. Tax experts say the IRS doesn't always closely scrutinize small
refunds.
One of
his clients, Jean Prevost and her husband, Jim, who live near Minneapolis,
received a refund of almost $1,500 in federal and state taxes in 2003.
"It
wasn't a huge amount of money, but it was ours," she said.
But the
IRS wasn't pleased with Ulrich, accusing him of promoting abusive tax
shelters and demanding the names of his clients, which he said he refused to
provide.
The
agency backed off in 2004 with help from the IRS's Taxpayer Advocate office,
Ulrich said.
IRS
spokesman Bruce Friedland said the agency is prohibited from commenting on
its interactions with taxpayers.
One of
Ulrich's clients, Eugene Fisher, a trustee for a Baltimore, Md.-based trust,
sued the IRS in February 2004 after being denied a refund.
Judge
Francis Allegra of the Court of Federal Claims in Washington sided with
Fisher and called the IRS' view "illogical" in an Aug. 6 decision. He
ordered the agency to refund $5,725 in taxes plus interest to the trust
overseen by Fisher.
It's not
clear how many people could benefit from the ruling. Many of the 30 million
policyholders are probably too late to seek refunds, since claims must be
filed within three years of the April 15 tax deadline. That means the
statute of limitations for taxes paid for 2004 ran out April 15, 2008.
Many
individual taxpayers may not have enough at stake to go to the trouble, said
Burgess Raby, a Tempe, Ariz.-based attorney who represented Fisher. Still,
millions of policyholders could benefit from the court's ruling, he said.
Raby
credits Ulrich with being the driving force behind the issue.
"The
genesis for this was Chuck's real feeling that this was an unfair position"
by the IRS, Raby said.
The
government could appeal the ruling and likely will fight future refund
claims, perhaps hoping for a different outcome in a separate court, tax
experts said.
Charles
Miller, a spokesman for the Justice Department, said the government hasn't
yet decided whether to appeal.
Still,
taxpayers should request refunds if they're eligible, the tax experts said,
because even if the IRS rejects the claim, doing so extends the deadline for
a potential refund for two more years.
Ulrich
will prepare refund requests for interested taxpayers, for a fee, and has
posted additional information at his Web site, http://www.demutualization.biz.
But he said the principle is more important to him.
"I think
it's important that taxpayers' rights be protected," he said. "We should
have had a Boston Tea Party over this."
Obama-Victory-Problem-Offshore-Financial-Centers
Obama-Tax-Proposals
2009-IRS-Inflation-Adjustments
IRS-Computer-Defects
Identity-Theft-IRS-Records
IRS-Guidance-Advice
2009-Income-Tax-Deductions-Exemptions
Breaking-Tax-News
First-Time-Homebuyer-Credit
Internal-Revenue-Manual-Update
Separate-Unequal-Tax-Systems
States-Increase-Tax-Collection
State-Tax-Burden-Businesses
Taxpayer-Victory-Mutual-Life-Insurance
Tax-Return-Preparer-Errors
US-Companies-Shifting-Income-Offshore
How-Rich-Cheat-Taxes
Home-Foreclosure-Tax
Energy-Tax-Credits-2009
Charitable-Tax-Tips
Fraudulent-Tax-Refunds
Self-Employed-Pension-Deductions
Auto-Mileage-Deduction-2009
IRS-Loses-in-Court
Saver's-Tax-Credit
Charitable-Donations
IRS-Speeds-Tax-Lien-Relief
|