Some tax pros get it wrong
Limited study of paid preparers' returns
finds many mistakes
By Andrea
Coombes, MarketWatch, Sept. 14, 2008
SAN
FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- In a limited study of tax returns completed by
unlicensed paid preparers, 17 out of 28 -- or 61% -- were prepared
incorrectly, including one that showed the taxpayer owing $4,903 more than
he really did, according to a study by the Treasury Inspector General for
Tax Administration, which provides independent oversight of IRS activities.
While most
of the mistakes resulted in an underpayment of taxes or a too-big refund,
sometimes it was the taxpayer, not the government, who would have paid for
the mistake, according to the study in which TIGTA auditors posed as regular
taxpayers and visited tax preparation offices in a single metropolitan area.
Six returns
overstated the amount taxpayers owed by a total of $7,798, with the most
glaring of these showing the $4,903 overpayment. Another return had a $1,043
overpayment, while the others were under $1,000. The returns prepared for
the study were never filed; the auditors told the preparers they would file
the returns themselves, but didn't.
Given the
study's small sample size, the findings cannot be generalized to all paid
preparers.
Other
returns understated taxes owed and overstated refunds due, shorting the
government by a total of $20,626. Taking the 17 returns together, all told
the government would have been out $12,828 had the returns been filed. For
the study, TIGTA auditors created five different taxpayer scenarios,
including single, married filing jointly and head of household, with incomes
ranging from $16,000 to $85,000.
Overall,
only 11 of the 28 returns showed the correct amount for tax owed or refund
due. In 2007, the IRS processed about 83 million individual income tax
returns filed by paid preparers, according to the report.
The
auditors went to tax preparers at 12 commercial chains and 16 small,
independently owned businesses. The report does not name practitioners and
does not say in which metro area the study was conducted.
Six returns were prepared with "willful or reckless" disregard for the tax
rules while another 11 simply had mistakes. For instance, one of those six
preparers claimed a charitable deduction on the return, even after the
auditor posing as a taxpayer said he had made no charitable contributions
that year. That same preparer also added a property-tax deduction for a car
-- even though the taxpayer didn't say anything or offer any documentation
verifying he was eligible for that deduction, according to the report.
Those six
preparers filed 973 tax returns during the past tax season, according to the
report. "We have referred matters that we encountered to the IRS so that any
appropriate follow-up actions can be taken," the report said.
A focus on
unlicensed preparers
The study
focused on unlicensed and unenrolled preparers, specifically those who were
not certified public accountants, enrolled agents or tax attorneys.
"Unenrolled
and unlicensed preparers are not regulated. There have been ongoing concerns
from Congress and other stakeholders about the lack of required training or
demonstration of ability to apply tax law correctly for these unregulated
tax return preparers," said J. Russell George, the Treasury Inspector
General for Tax Administration, in an email message.
Attorneys
and certified public accountants are regulated by state licensing agencies
and associations such as the American Bar Association and the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Meanwhile, enrolled agents must
pass an IRS test and are essentially approved by the IRS to practice.
There are
an estimated 800,000 unenrolled and unlicensed tax preparers, said Paul
Cinquemani, director of government relations with the National Association
of Tax Professionals, which represents tax preparers both licensed and
unlicensed.
The report
said the IRS does not have a database of preparers and that the IRS
"acknowledges that it does not know how many paid preparers exist and cannot
determine the full extent of noncompliance and incompetence among
practitioners."
"Anyone --
regardless of training, experience, skill or knowledge -- is allowed to
prepare federal income tax returns for others for a fee," the report said.
Only two states, California and Oregon, require these preparers to register
with state agencies and meet continuing-education requirements, according to
the report. Currently, proposed bills in the U.S. House and Senate aim to
better regulate tax-return preparers.
The report
recommends that every tax preparer be assigned a single identification
number to make it easier for the IRS to ascertain which preparers are
causing the most errors. Currently, tax preparers can file taxes using a
variety of different identifiers, including their own Social Security
number, their practitioner tax ID number or their company's employer ID
number. The IRS responded to TIGTA's recommendation by saying it will study
the issue.
Ask about
education
Given that
taxpayers are ultimately responsible for the information filed on their
return, it behooves consumers to be careful when hiring a paid preparer,
whether licensed or not -- even licensed professionals may make mistakes.
Whether you
go with a licensed or unlicensed preparer, it's important to assess whether
there are any complaints against that person. That's easier to do when the
tax preparer is licensed or registered with a state or other agency. But
another option is checking your local Better Business Bureau. Also, find a
practitioner who is a member in good standing of a trade or professional
group.
And, be
sure to ask about education before laying down your money. "I'd say, 'Give
me some evidence you've had continuing education this year," said Cinquemani,
of the NATP. "If they could produce nothing, or wouldn't tell me anything,
I'd go down to the next one," he said.
For
taxpayers seeking a preparer, NATP's Web site offers a "find a professional"
tool. Cinquemani said complaints against members are investigated, and tax
preparers who don't meet the association's standards are "dismissed
automatically."
See the site.
Also, try
the National Association of Enrolled Agents.
See the site.
And the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
See the site.
A spokesman
for H&R Block said the company supports the study's recommendation to
register tax preparers. "We strongly support tax professional
certification," said Gene King, an H&R Block spokesman, adding that "the
typical H&R Block client is seen by a preparer with eight-plus years
experience and 450 hours of training." About 5% of the company's tax
practitioners are Circular 230 certified, he said. Circular 230 generally
refers to attorneys, certified public accountants and enrolled agents.
Jackson
Hewitt said it, too, agrees with the report's recommendation, adding that it
"recognizes that ongoing education of tax preparers is critical," said
Kristen Sharkey, a spokeswoman. "Jackson Hewitt has implemented compliance
systems and education programs that are designed to ensure high levels of
competency and training," she said, adding that the company "has publicly
stated to the IRS that they welcome more uniform standards and compliance
efforts to all tax preparers." Jackson Hewitt said it employs both enrolled
and unenrolled preparers, but does not disclose specific numbers.
Wide
variation in fees charged
Consumers
should also shop around on fees. The report found a range of fees charged
for the same taxpayer scenario. For instance, auditors were charged five
different amounts by five different preparers to complete a return for the
same hypothetical taxpayer -- that of a divorced wage-earning parent with
one child under 17 -- in the same metropolitan area.
The fees
ranged from $74 to $271. Paying more did not guarantee a more accurate
return: Three preparers who charged $74, $150 and $271, respectively,
provided correct returns, while the others contained errors. One
practitioner who charged $200 prepared a return that was "willfully or
recklessly" prepared, according to the report. 
Andrea
Coombes is an assistant personal finance editor for MarketWatch, based in
San Francisco.
|